Jelly Star vs Titan Slim
Side-by-side specs, benchmarks and the SpecEagle AI verdict.
vs
AI Verdict
The Titan Slim takes the overall edge with a 50/100 to 48/100 SpecEagle score, leading on Display, Battery, Build, Keyboard. The Jelly Star counters on Performance, Pocketability, Value.
SpecEagle subscores
42
Display
56
50
Camera
50
56
Performance
50
50
Battery
76
68
Build
78
100
Pocketability
0
64
Value
60
0
Keyboard
90
Category wins: Jelly Star 3 · 4 Titan Slim
Benchmarks
Test
A · Unihertz
B · Unihertz
AnTuTu v10
410,000▲
260,000
Geekbench 6 Single
700▲
480
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,900▲
1,400
3DMark Solar Bay
6.0▲
2.5
Full specifications
A · Unihertz
B · Unihertz
Type
IPS LCD
IPS LCD
Size
3.0 inches
4.2 inches (above QWERTY)
Resolution
480 × 854 px
1,260 × 720 px
A · Unihertz
B · Unihertz
Main
48 MP Sony IMX582, f/1.79
48 MP Sony IMX582, f/1.79
Selfie
8 MP
8 MP
A · Unihertz
B · Unihertz
Chipset
MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm)
MediaTek Helio P70 (12 nm)
RAM
8 GB LPDDR4X
6 GB LPDDR4X
Storage
256 GB
256 GB
A · Unihertz
B · Unihertz
Capacity
2,000 mAh
4,100 mAh
Wired
10 W
24 W
Choose Jelly Star if…
- Smallest Android phone in production.
- 48 MP Sony IMX582 camera in a 3-inch body.
- 8 GB / 256 GB is unreasonable for the size.
- Translucent rear is a real design statement.
Choose Titan Slim if…
- Only widely-available QWERTY Android in 2024-25.
- BlackBerry-style 35-key layout.
- 48 MP Sony IMX582 main camera.
- Lightweight 204 g for a keyboard phone.